Product Reviews

By-Pass Secateurs

By-Pass Secateurs
Average Customer Rating:
2.833 out of 5
2.8
 out of 
5
(6 Reviews) 6
Open Ratings Snapshot
Rating Breakdown 6 reviews
5 stars
2
4 stars
1
3 stars
0
2 stars
0
1 star
3
3 of 6(50%)reviewers would recommend this product.
Customer Reviews for By-Pass Secateurs
Review 1 for By-Pass Secateurs
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Performance: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Reliability: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? Yes
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Performance: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Reliability: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Secateurs
24 Nov 2014
By
, Taunton
"Excellent Product. Easy to use. Does exactly as it says on the packet. Would buy again and would tell friends to buy."
Review 2 for By-Pass Secateurs
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Performance: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Reliability: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? Yes
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Performance: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Reliability: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Good value!
3 Nov 2008
By
, Loughborough
"@ £3.99 what more do you want from secateurs. I would only say they are good for general home use as I have another better pair for use at work."
2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Review 3 for By-Pass Secateurs
Overall Rating: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
3 out of 5
3 out of 5
Performance: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Reliability: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? Yes
Overall Rating: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
3 out of 5
3 out of 5
Performance: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Reliability: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
17747 Secatears
10 Jun 2009
By
, Thames valley
"Good apart from the locking latch bent and had to be removed."
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Review 4 for By-Pass Secateurs
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
Features: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
Performance: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? No
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
Features: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
Performance: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Poor
17 Nov 2011
By
, Argyll
"Quite good cutting action but the spring fell out on second day of use, never to be seen again. I would advise giving these a miss and spending a bit more."
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Review 5 for By-Pass Secateurs
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Features: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Performance: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? No
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Features: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Performance: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Useless secateurs
12 May 2011
By
, London
"On the first day i used them the spring action stop working so now when cut now i have to keep opening up the secateurs manually rather than it spring back automatically complete waste of money"
Review 6 for By-Pass Secateurs
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
3 out of 5
3 out of 5
Features: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
Performance: 
3 out of 5
3 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? No
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
3 out of 5
3 out of 5
Features: 
2 out of 5
2 out of 5
Performance: 
3 out of 5
3 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Best avoided
11 Feb 2010
By
, North Wales
"The blades are sharp and have a fair cutting action. But, the foam handle covers soon come adrift and screws loosen with the action of cutting, which fall to the ground never to be seen again! The Teflon coated blade is pointless. Pay a bit more for better quality. These are best avoided."