Product Reviews

RM Indirect SS Cylinder

RM Indirect SS Cylinder
Average Customer Rating:
3 out of 5
3
 out of 
5
(2 Reviews) 2
Open Ratings Snapshot
Rating Breakdown 2 reviews
5 stars
1
4 stars
0
3 stars
0
2 stars
0
1 star
1
1 of 2(50%)reviewers would recommend this product.
Customer Reviews for RM Indirect SS Cylinder 935 x 400
Review 1 for RM Indirect SS Cylinder 935 x 400
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Performance: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Reliability: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? Yes
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Features: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Performance: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Reliability: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5
Excellent replacement cylinder
2 Nov 2014
By
, Buckingham
"This slimmer stainless steel cylinder 400mm plus 70mm insulation is an excellent replacement for an old copper 900mm x 450mm cylinder.
Minimum adjustment to pipework as connection points are pretty much as the same level as old cylinder except for hot water point at the top as it is slightly taller at 935mm plus foam insulation.
5 star for value and performance but too soon to comment on reliability. One thing to note, you will to blank off additional point if not needed and also recommend rinsing out before fitting."
Review 2 for RM Indirect SS Cylinder 935 x 400
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Features: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Performance: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Would you recommend this product? No
Overall Rating: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Value: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Features: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Performance: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Reliability: 
1 out of 5
1 out of 5
Wrong sizes !!!
17 Apr 2013
By
, Hertfordshire
"had two of theses turn up on separate occasions and both packaged as 1050x400 & only 900x400 size
lot of time wasted rectifying what should be an easy thing to size....
"
1 of 4 people found this review helpful.